<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conservative247 &#187; biden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservative247.org/tag/biden/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservative247.org</link>
	<description>A conservative primer for those who might want to learn a few things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:17:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A close look at the federal tax burden of corporations and individuals</title>
		<link>http://conservative247.org/government/745/a-close-look-at-the-federal-tax-burden-of-corporations-and-individuals.html</link>
		<comments>http://conservative247.org/government/745/a-close-look-at-the-federal-tax-burden-of-corporations-and-individuals.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax burden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservative247.org/?p=745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you better off than you were four years ago? It&#8217;s a question asked at Obama campaign events, and I&#8217;ve been thinking about different ways one can answer the question. We can measure economic success a number of ways &#8211; housing costs, gas prices, energy bills, retirement account balances and net worth are all measurable, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservative247.org/government/745/a-close-look-at-the-federal-tax-burden-of-corporations-and-individuals.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reagan didn&#8217;t need to be tested</title>
		<link>http://conservative247.org/national-politics/667/reagan-didnt-need-to-be-tested.html</link>
		<comments>http://conservative247.org/national-politics/667/reagan-didnt-need-to-be-tested.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservative247.org/?p=667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Biden&#8217;s comment about Obama being tested within the first six months if elected, I noted that the vice presidential candidate mentioned Kennedy &#8211; most likely referring to the Cuban missile Crisis &#8211; but didn&#8217;t mention other more recent presidents that were tested.

Bush (43) was tested within nine months with direct attacks on this country, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservative247.org/national-politics/667/reagan-didnt-need-to-be-tested.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case against the Obama presidency (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://conservative247.org/national-politics/621/the-case-against-the-obama-presidency-part-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://conservative247.org/national-politics/621/the-case-against-the-obama-presidency-part-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservative247.org/?p=621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reviewing Hot Air&#8217;s post written by Guy Benson, Mary Katharine Ham and Ed Morrissey, it became apparent more needed to be done. It is a good review, but there are many more reasons you should not vote for Obama Nov. 4.
I called that post my shortest in history since I provided no analysis, but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservative247.org/national-politics/621/the-case-against-the-obama-presidency-part-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paid too much for your house? O&#8217;Biden&#8217;s gotcha covered</title>
		<link>http://conservative247.org/national-politics/507/paid-too-much-for-your-house-obidens-gotcha-covered.html</link>
		<comments>http://conservative247.org/national-politics/507/paid-too-much-for-your-house-obidens-gotcha-covered.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage principal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservative247.org/?p=507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a bunch of debate analysis available on the Web, but there is one answer that I wanted to review this morning. The question concerned the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act, which set specific standards concerning the ability to file Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy.
O&#8217;Binden wants to allow courts to adjust [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservative247.org/national-politics/507/paid-too-much-for-your-house-obidens-gotcha-covered.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biden won&#8217;t let Obama take his guns &#8211; or ours</title>
		<link>http://conservative247.org/government/constitution/444/binde-wont-let-obama-take-his-guns-or-ours.html</link>
		<comments>http://conservative247.org/government/constitution/444/binde-wont-let-obama-take-his-guns-or-ours.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 02:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concealed carry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservative247.org/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My first thought when I heard about Biden&#8217;s statement concerning firearm ownership was &#8211; I&#8217;ll bet my last dollar he was not in San Fransisco, Seattle, Chicago or New York. No way. Biden stated, &#8220;I guarantee you Barack Obama ain&#8217;t taking my shotguns, so don&#8217;t buy that malarkey.&#8221;
Biden spoke at the United Mine Workers of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservative247.org/government/constitution/444/binde-wont-let-obama-take-his-guns-or-ours.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
