Comments on: DOJ policy statement may preclude hacker prosecution http://conservative247.org/national-politics/457/doj-policy-statement-may-preclude-hacker-prosecution.html A conservative primer for those who might want to learn a few things. Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:31:49 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Steve M http://conservative247.org/national-politics/457/doj-policy-statement-may-preclude-hacker-prosecution.html/comment-page-1#comment-605 Steve M Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:09:40 +0000 http://conservative247.org/?p=457#comment-605 "No they are saying treat it the same as other network stored files." Still do not understand it. I think that they are saying that if you <strong>read</strong> it and then <strong>leave it</strong> on the Yahoo! server (in this case) and someone hacks in to look at it and spread it around - you're SOL. Would you say that is the DOJ position? “No they are saying treat it the same as other network stored files.”

Still do not understand it. I think that they are saying that if you read it and then leave it on the Yahoo! server (in this case) and someone hacks in to look at it and spread it around – you’re SOL.

Would you say that is the DOJ position?

]]> By: bob z http://conservative247.org/national-politics/457/doj-policy-statement-may-preclude-hacker-prosecution.html/comment-page-1#comment-604 bob z Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:42:26 +0000 http://conservative247.org/?p=457#comment-604 "The DOJ is saying that they want to treat e-mail that was <strong>read</strong> differently than e-mail that has <strong>yet to be read</strong>?" No they are saying treat it the same as other network stored files. “The DOJ is saying that they want to treat e-mail that was read differently than e-mail that has yet to be read?”

No they are saying treat it the same as other network stored files.

]]>