<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conservative247 &#187; Judicial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservative247.org/category/government/judicial/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservative247.org</link>
	<description>A conservative primer for those who might want to learn a few things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:17:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Court action may discourage First Aid and CPR training</title>
		<link>http://conservative247.org/government/judicial/921/court-action-may-discourage-first-aid-and-cpr-training.html</link>
		<comments>http://conservative247.org/government/judicial/921/court-action-may-discourage-first-aid-and-cpr-training.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 21:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservative247.org/?p=921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Discouraging First Aid and CPR training
I&#8217;m just not sure what to think about this issue. As someone who has trained lay persons in first aid, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the use of automated external defibrillator (AEDs), I understand the value of such programs.
Now, the California Supreme Court has ruled that a woman who pulled a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservative247.org/government/judicial/921/court-action-may-discourage-first-aid-and-cpr-training.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Half of Obama supporters think SCOTUS rulings should not follow Constitution</title>
		<link>http://conservative247.org/government/judicial/407/half-of-obama-supporters-think-scotus-should-not-follow-constitution.html</link>
		<comments>http://conservative247.org/government/judicial/407/half-of-obama-supporters-think-scotus-should-not-follow-constitution.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judical nominees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservative247.org/?p=407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a brutal assessment on how liberals think the Judicial Branch should make decisions. For conservatives, this is beyond the tipping point and concerns me more than any political or economic subject. Almost half of Obama supporters think that judges should base decisions on what they think is right or fair.
That&#8217;s right, almost half [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservative247.org/government/judicial/407/half-of-obama-supporters-think-scotus-should-not-follow-constitution.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Affirms Heller &#8211; There is an Individual Right</title>
		<link>http://conservative247.org/government/judicial/178/heller-decision-today-at-10-am-et.html</link>
		<comments>http://conservative247.org/government/judicial/178/heller-decision-today-at-10-am-et.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservative247.org/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Normally, this site does not cover breaking news, but for the DC v Heller case, we&#8217;re making an editorial decision to post information as soon as it is released. We&#8217;ll provide the full PDF of the decision &#8211; and the dissenting opinion if there is one &#8211; here on the site.
SCOTUSblog has the Cover it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservative247.org/government/judicial/178/heller-decision-today-at-10-am-et.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Hears Heller Case &#8211; 10 a.m. ET Today</title>
		<link>http://conservative247.org/government/constitution/120/supreme-court-hears-heller-case-10-am-et-today.html</link>
		<comments>http://conservative247.org/government/constitution/120/supreme-court-hears-heller-case-10-am-et-today.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservative247.org/government/constitution/120/supreme-court-hears-heller-case-10-am-et-today.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who are interested, the Supremes are hearing arguments today in the case of Heller v. D.C. Michelle Malkin posted a few excellent background links. To be clear, the case will not be ruled on today, it&#8217;s just oral arguments at the court. Although the decision will not settle the situation across the country, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservative247.org/government/constitution/120/supreme-court-hears-heller-case-10-am-et-today.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reorganize, Rethink, Get Fired Up</title>
		<link>http://conservative247.org/national-politics/54/reorganize-rethink-get-fired-up.html</link>
		<comments>http://conservative247.org/national-politics/54/reorganize-rethink-get-fired-up.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservative247.org/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Romney effectively out, most true conservatives feel lost and disappointed. Now is not the time to give up, but we must look at our priorities and how conservatives approach appreciation of their ideas.
Today, prior to Romney&#8217;s speech at CPAC, Michelle Malkin wrote a good piece.
On Wednesday, wielding his olive branch like a schoolmarm’s ruler, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservative247.org/national-politics/54/reorganize-rethink-get-fired-up.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
